Rural Poverty in Remote PNG: A Case Study of Obura-Wonenara District

Speech by
The Rt Hon Sir Mekere Morauta, KCMG MP, Minister for Public Enterprises
at the launch of


at the National Research Institute
Port Moresby
November 17, 2011

Good morning ladies and gentlemen. May I extend a special welcome to representatives of
CARE International PNG and the Australian National University’s Development Policy
Centre, which are the two organisations responsible for the report that is being launched
today. I thank them for their interest in and contribution to Papua New Guinea.

The report does not paint a pretty picture. It shows life in rural and remote Papua New
Guinea as it really is:

 Malnutrition
 Unsafe drinking water
 Poor health and consequently low life expectancy
 Very little education
 Unsatisfactory shelter and clothing
 Little access to income-earning opportunities
 Unavailability of services beyond the most basic level

The point I want to make is that life in these places does not have to be this way.

We have had ample opportunity since 1975 to improve our way of life, yet apart from the
first few years of Independence we have not done so. In the last 8 years the country has
enjoyed massive flows of revenue from oil, copper and gold projects, but virtually none of it
has been translated into services and benefits for rural people.

I call this “the PNG paradox” – rich in resources, but poor in services. Plenty of money, but
little to show for it. For 9 years we had one government, so-called political stability, at a time
of unprecedented revenue flows to the Government. What did the money and political
stability bring to the people or rural PNG? Clearly, something is missing. What is the missing link between money, political stability and poverty and lack of services? We have to find an answer to this question. Otherwise, the
enormous additional wealth expected from PNG LNG will only aggravate the paradox.

It is clear that the way we are managing resources is not producing positive results. Doing
things the way we have always done them has failed the nation, and the result is social
indicators that are among the worst in the world.

What is stopping us change our way of managing our resources?

One of the reasons is that we are frightened of reform.

We are scared of change.

My view is that what we should really be afraid of is the status quo.

The CARE-ANU report provides us with some detailed statistics about the poor quality of
life in many areas of Papua New Guinea.

As we have heard it focussed on the 262 families living in the Yelia Local Government Area
of Obura-Wonenara, but its facts speak for many, many other places across the nation.

I won’t repeat the key findings of the survey. I will only add that I know many families from
this part of the country, and I also know that for them, nothing much has changed since

That is why we need reform. Reform is urgent. It is not always popular because it changes
the status quo and may deprive those benefitting from the status quo; it carries risks because
it introduces an element of the unknown.

So reform is always a challenge, but when structured properly can make a big difference.

As Minister for Public Enterprises, I am responsible for a number of State-Owned
Enterprises. I intend to reform them so that they are more responsive to community needs, to
make them operate in a more sustainable manner so that they are not a constant drain on the
public purse, and so that price rises are contained.

People seem to forget that these SOEs do not belong to the Government of the day; they do
not exist to glorify our image, or to fly our flag. These enterprises are owned by the people of
Papua New Guinea to provide services for their welfare – transport, power, water,
telecommunications. The question then to ask is WHY is it that they are not providing
extensive, reliable, affordable and decent quality services? Under public ownership, these
service providers have proved incapable. So is the choice between ownership and services?

Take an example. Air Niugini flies to 17 ports throughout the country, just 17 in a country
where air transport is the only form of communication and transport for millions of people. It
is not able to extend services to more areas without a capital injection of hundreds of millions
of kina and then, ongoing subsidies. What is the solution? How do we change Air Niugini to
be well capitalised, profitable and able to extend services to rural areas without government
financial support? Difficult to see how, if under government ownership.

IPBC has completed strategic reviews of all SOEs to get a snapshot of their state of health so that we can take appropriate action.

It is clear that there is room for significant improvement in different areas across
all SOEs.

Most have long-term structural issues that need to be dealt with and a few have
serious immediate problems. All are chronically under-capitalised and are fatally
dependent on the public purse. Most are poorly managed and lack commercial

My intention is to make them all operate with sound governance and to meet
minimum service standards in a commercially sustainable manner.
SOEs must stop running to the Government every year begging for more money.
Every possible toea of Government money should be going into essential services
such as health, education, infrastructure and law and order. Essential services
which the people of Yelia LLG, and all the people of PNG need.

The O’Neill-Namah Government has also agreed to set up an Infrastructure
Authority within the Sovereign Wealth Fund. The authority will be charged with
maintaining and expanding our national infrastructure. Nothing could be more
important for people in remote communities such as Yelia than well-maintained

These are the reforms that will help improve the daily lives of the people of Yelia
LLG and others like them.

Things will not change overnight, but a start is being made, and that is in stark
contrast to what has gone on before.

One essential for reform is an open mind. Recently there have been all sorts of noisy but
pointless debates about what sort of “ism” we should follow in reforming our State-Owned

Capitalism? Socialism? Marxist-Leninism? Liberalism?
This is all irrelevant humbug, mostly from vested interests, rent-seekers, and people who
simply like to push their own political barrow.

Remember the opposition to two of my reforms – the rescue of National Provident Fund from
financial collapse caused by political interference, and the decision to merge PNGBC with
Bank South Pacific.

NPF was on the brink of failure when I became Prime Minister in 1999. Members stood to
lose every toea they had – their life savings.

Today Nasfund, as NPF is now known, is a strong independent and highly successful
superannuation fund. Today it has almost 130,000 members, and made an after-tax profit last year of K295 million.
From 2001 to 2010 its assets grew from K268 million to K2.2 billion – a growth of 830%
over the period.

Sensible, responsible and effective reform has transformed Nasfund, and in the process
assured the retirement future of 130,000 Papua New Guineans who were faced with financial

It is a similar story with banking reform. In 1999, the so-called “people’s bank”, PNGBC,
was bankrupt because it had been robbed by politicians and their cronies, and mismanaged in
its dying years.

My decision to merge it with BSP has been a similar success.

The new people’s bank, BSP, is still 90 per cent-plus-owned by Papua New Guineans. It is
clearly the biggest and best bank in the Pacific Islands. It is highly profitable, and made an
operating profit after tax of $276 million last year. It has opened more branches and employs
38% more people today than the two banks did in 1999.

So as a bank, BSP is highly successful. But it does not operate in all rural areas and it is still
Government’s job to find ways of extending financial and banking services to rural people.
There are ways of doing it, but again involve reform.

It is time we stopped thinking in tired old ways and introduce new recipes for successful
national development.

That is the only way to help the people of Yelia LLG in a sustainable way over the long term.
I am pleased that CARE is implementing a community-based project to help the people of
Yelia, and that further surveys are planned. I welcome this monitoring, and I am confident
that, if we stick with reforms, we will start to see progress in Yelia, and throughout PNG.

Mekere Morauta KCMG MP
Minister for Public Enterprises

Click Here To Download